Although best known for playing one of classic television's ultimate good girls, as well as being the wife of comedic actor Ben Stiller, actress Christine Taylor.The Flow of Energy: Higher Trophic Levels. Three. hundred trout are needed to support one man for a year. The. trout, in turn, must consume 9. What are the differences between assimilation. How do ecosystems differ in the amount. What are the main controls on ecosystem. Without autotrophs, there. However, the continual loss of energy due to metabolic. Second Law of Thermodynamics). Today we. will look at how and where this energy moves through an ecosystem once. Most of you are now familiar with. Figure 1). It is simply. Primary. producers comprise the bottom trophic level, followed by primary consumers. When we talk of moving . On average, it is consumed or decomposed. If NPP was. not consumed, it would pile up somewhere. Usually this doesn't happen. Carboniferous and Pennsylvanian. NPP in excess of consumption accumulated in swamps. When we burn these deposits (same chemical reaction as above. CO2 goes into. the atmosphere as a greenhouse gas. This is the situation that we have. CO2 from burning these deposits (past. NPP) is going into the atmosphere and building up over time. But let's get back to an ecosystem. As energy passes from trophic level. Tyler Miller, Jr., American Chemist (1971). In the process, metabolic work is done and energy in chemical bonds is converted to heat energy. Find Miami Herald newspaper and MiamiHerald.com's Archives. News Sports Business Real Estate Sign In Subscribe. Sports (Monday - Friday) Heat. TROPICAMP: Some Notes on H. TROPICAMP: Some Notes on H. Research from JAMA — Ankle Edema in Tropical Climes. Tropical Ecstasy Tropical Ecstasy (1971) Cast. Only a fraction of the energy available. The rule. of thumb is 1. Typically the numbers and biomass of. An Example: The Fox and the Hare. To understand these rules, we must examine. Suppose we have some amount. The following diagram (Figure 2) illustrates how this works. Part of this material. What cannot be assimilated. Thus we can make the following. Assimilation = (Ingestion - Excretion). The efficiency. of this process of assimilation varies in animals, ranging from 1. The hare uses a significant fraction. This energy. used (lost) is attributed to cellular respiration. The remainder goes into. The conversion of. NPP of plants. In our example, the secondary production of the hare. Clearly. because of all of the energy costs of hares engaged in normal metabolic. Just as we calculated the assimilation. This efficiency is equal to the production divided by. NPP divided by the GPP for plants. In equation form. NPP / GPP). These ratios measure the efficiency with. These efficiencies vary among organisms. For instance, on average vertebrates. On average, invertebrates use only ~8. Plants have the greatest net production efficiencies. The reason that some organisms have such low net. This requires much. Just as we can build our understanding. You might think. of it as the efficiency of hares at converting plants into fox food. In. equation form for our example, the ecological efficiency = (fox production. Thinking about ecological efficiency. In general, only about 1. For example, If hares consumed. For the hare population to be in steady state (neither. So the foxes. consume about 1. In fact, this ecological efficiency is quite variable. The. overall loss of energy from lower to higher trophic levels is important. From this understanding, it should. Generally this is true. Figure 3). Figure 3. A pyramid of biomass showing. Pyramids of Biomass. Energy, and Numbers. A pyramid of biomass is a representation. Figure 3, above, Figure 4b below). The. amount of energy available to one trophic level is limited by the amount. Because energy is lost in the transfer from. In general, we would expect that higher trophic levels. We could also construct a pyramid. Figure 4a). For the oceans as shown in. Figure 4, the bottom level would be quite large, due to the enormous number. For other ecosystems, the pyramid of numbers might be inverted. Just as with the inverted pyramid. The oceans are such an exception. Thus a pyramid of biomass for the oceans can appear inverted. Figure 4b). This is a good question, and can. Even though the biomass may be small, the RATE. Thus over time it is. We can examine this further by constructing. Once done, the figure for the ocean would have the characteristic. Figure 4c). Algal populations can double in a. Thus, a pyramid of energy takes into. Figure 4: Pyramids of numbers, biomass. We see that thinking about pyramids. But here we are talking about the residence time of . This difference in residence time. Humans and Energy. Consumption. All of the animal species on earth are. For. all practical purposes, it is the products of terrestrial plant productivity. What fraction of the terrestrial NPP do humans use. It turns out to be a surprisingly large fraction. Let's. use our knowledge of ecological energetics to examine this very important. Because only the energy . In a cropland NPP and annual harvest occur in the same. In forests, annual harvest can exceed annual NPP (for example, when. Outputs: 3 Scenarios How much NPP humans use directly, as. This gives a low estimate of human appropriation. NPP. Total productivity of lands devoted. This includes total cropland NPP, and also. This gives a middle. A high estimate is obtained by. This is an estimate of the total human impact on terrestrial productivity. Units: We will use the Pg. Pedagram of organic matter (= 1. There is some possibility that below- ground NPP. NPP may be underestimated because. Total. Table 1: Surface area. Atjay et al. 1. 97. De. Vooys 1. 97. 9). Ecosystem Type. Surface area(x 1. NPP(Pg)Forest. 31. Woodland. grassland, and savanna. Deserts. 30. 3. 1. Arctic- alpine. 25. Cultivated. land. Human. terrestrial(chapparral, bogs, swamps, marshes)6. Subtotal. terrestrial. Lakes. and streams. Marine. 36. 19. 1. Subtotal. aquatic. Total. 51. 02. 24. The Low Calculation: (See Table 2) (a) Plant material directly. X 2. 50. 0 kcal/person/day X 0. Pg organic matter. If we assume that 1. Pg of plant matter. Estimate of human harvest of grains and other. Pg annually. This implies loss, spoilage, or wastage. Pg, or 3. 4% of the total harvest.(b) Consumption by livestock. Pg, and there seems to be some uncertainty. Our low estimate uses 2. Pg.(c) Forests: harvest of wood. Amount used for firewood, especially. The table gives a low estimate. If we assume the average fish is two trophic. NPP to produce those. Pg annually. Total: Humans. Pg of organic matter directly each year. This is about 3 %. NPP. Table 2: Amount. NPP used directlyby. Source. NPP used(Pg)Cultivated. Domestic. animal fodder. Wood. products. Construction,Fiber. Firewood. 1. 2. 1. Fisheries. (0. 0. Harvested)2. 0. Total. Percent. NPP (7. 2/2. The Intermediate Calculation. See Table 3) We add to the low calculation. NPP co- opted by humans. This is: (a) All cropland NPP(b) All pastureland that was converted. NPP consumed by livestock on natural grazing. A number of forest land uses(d) Human occupied areas including. Total is 4. 2. 6 Pg. NPP per year, or 1. NPP. Table 3: Intermediate calculation of. NPP. co- opted by humans. Source. NPPCo- opted(Pg)Cultivated. Grazing. land: Converted pastures. Consumed on natural grazing lands. Burned on natural grazing land. Subtotal. 9. 8. 0. Forest. land: Killed during harvest, not used. Shifting cultivation. Land clearing. Forest plantation productivity. Forest harvests. Subtotal. Human- occupied. areas. SUBTOTAL. TERRESTRIAL4. Aquatic. ecosystems. TOTAL4. 2. 6. Percent. Percent. aquatic co- opted(2. The High Calculation: (See. Table 4)For the high estimate we now include. NPP and potential NPP lost as a consequence of human activities: (a) Croplands are likely. If we use. production estimates from savanna- grasslands, it looks like cropland production. Pg.(b) Forest conversion to pasture. Pg.(c) Overuse: Some 3. Using. dry savanna estimates of NPP, global NPP has been reduced by 4. Pg.(d) Land conversion: Assuming. The total for the high. Pg of NPP used, co- opted, or lost. We also must add the. NPP to the world estimated NPP before we compute the fraction. This gives us 5. 8. Moreover, although major fish stocks. On land, one species, Homo. NPP. This has. probably never occurred before in earth's history. The consequences include environmental. Human . But at present levels of. NPP to well over 5. Thus the limits to. Notice that the lower we ? There are two dominant theories of the control of. The first, called bottom- up control, states that it. If the nutrient supply is increased, the resulting. The second theory, called. For example. if you have an increase in predators, that increase will result in fewer. Thus the. control of population numbers and overall productivity ? Well. as is often the case when there is a clear dichotomy to choose from, the. There is evidence from many ecosystem. BOTH controls are operating to some degree, but that NEITHER. Pyramids can often be . The human diet is derived from plant. Humans may consume, co- opt or make unavailable as much as 4. NPP for food, land, and other uses. Ecosystem function is controlled mainly. Townsend, C. R., J. L. Essentials of Ecology. Blackwell Science.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2016
Categories |